A telomere (/ˈtɛləmɪər, ˈtlə-/; from Ancient Greek τέλος (télos) 'end', and μέρος (méros) 'part') is a region of repetitive nucleotide sequences associated with specialized proteins at the ends of linear chromosomes. Telomeres are a widespread genetic feature most commonly found in eukaryotes. In most, if not all species possessing them, they protect the terminal regions of chromosomal DNA from progressive degradation and ensure the integrity of linear chromosomes by preventing DNA repair systems from mistaking the very ends of the DNA strand for a double-strand break.

Human chromosomes (grey) capped by telomeres (white)


In the early 1970s, Soviet theorist Alexei Olovnikov first recognized that chromosomes could not completely replicate their ends; this is known as the "end replication problem". Building on this, and accommodating Leonard Hayflick's idea of limited somatic cell division, Olovnikov suggested that DNA sequences are lost every time a cell replicates until the loss reaches a critical level, at which point cell division ends.[1][2][3] According to his theory of marginotomy DNA sequences at the ends of telomeres are represented by tandem repeats, which create a buffer that determines the number of divisions that a certain cell clone can undergo. Furthermore, it was predicted that a specialized DNA polymerase (originally called a tandem-DNA-polymerase) could extend telomeres in immortal tissues such as germ line, cancer cells and stem cells. It also followed from this hypothesis that organisms with circular genome, such as bacteria, do not have the end replication problem and therefore do not age.

In 1975–1977, Elizabeth Blackburn, working as a postdoctoral fellow at Yale University with Joseph G. Gall, discovered the unusual nature of telomeres, with their simple repeated DNA sequences composing chromosome ends.[4] Blackburn, Carol Greider, and Jack Szostak were awarded the 2009 Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine for the discovery of how chromosomes are protected by telomeres and the enzyme telomerase.[5]

In 1983, Barbara McClintock, an American cytogeneticist and the first woman to receive an unshared Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine, received the Nobel Prize for observing that the chromosomes lacking end parts became "sticky" and hypothesized the existence of a special structure at the chromosome tip that would maintain chromosome stability.[6]

Structure and functionEdit

End replication problemEdit

Lagging strand during DNA replication

During DNA replication, DNA polymerase cannot replicate the sequences present at the 3' ends of the parent strands. This is a consequence of its unidirectional mode of DNA synthesis: it can only attach new nucleotides to an existing 3'-end (that is, synthesis progresses 5'-3') and thus it requires a primer to initiate replication. On the leading strand (oriented 5'-3' within the replication fork), DNA-polymerase continuously replicates from the point of initiation all the way to the strand's end with the primer (made of RNA) then being excised and substituted by DNA. The lagging strand, however, is oriented 3'-5' with respect to the replication fork so continuous replication by DNA-polymerase is impossible, which necessitates discontinuous replication involving the repeated synthesis of primers further 5' of the site of initiation (see lagging strand replication). The last primer to be involved in lagging-strand replication sits near the 3'-end of the template (corresponding to the potential 5'-end of the lagging-strand). Originally it was believed that the last primer would sit at the very end of the template, thus, once removed, the DNA-polymerase that substitutes primers with DNA (DNA-Pol δ in eukaryotes)[note 1] would be unable to synthesize the "replacement DNA" from the 5'-end of the lagging strand so that the template nucleotides previously paired to the last primer would not be replicated.[7] It has since been questioned whether the last lagging strand primer is placed exactly at the 3'-end of the template and it was demonstrated that it is rather synthesized at a distance of about 70-100 nucleotides which is consistent with the finding that DNA in cultured human cell is shortened by 50-100 base pairs per cell division.[8]

If coding sequences are degraded in this process, potentially vital genetic code would be lost. Telomeres are non-coding, repetitive sequences located at the termini of linear chromosomes to act as buffers for those coding sequences further behind. They "cap" the end-sequences and are progressively degraded in the process of DNA replication.

The "end replication problem" is exclusive to linear chromosomes as circular chromosomes do not have ends lying without reach of DNA-polymerases. Most prokaryotes, relying on circular chromosomes, accordingly do not possess telomeres.[9] A small fraction of bacterial chromosomes (such as those in Streptomyces, Agrobacterium, and Borrelia), however, are linear and possess telomeres, which are very different from those of the eukaryotic chromosomes in structure and function. The known structures of bacterial telomeres take the form of proteins bound to the ends of linear chromosomes, or hairpin loops of single-stranded DNA at the ends of the linear chromosomes.[10]

Telomere ends and shelterinEdit

Shelterin co-ordinates the T-loop formation of telomeres.

At the very 3'-end of the telomere there is a 300 base pair overhang which can invade the double-stranded portion of the telomere forming a structure known as a T-loop. This loop is analogous to a knot, which stabilizes the telomere, and prevents the telomere ends from being recognized as breakpoints by the DNA repair machinery. Should non-homologous end joining occur at the telomeric ends, chromosomal fusion would result. The T-loop is maintained by several proteins, collectively referred to as the shelterin complex. In humans, the shelterin complex consists of six proteins identified as TRF1, TRF2, TIN2, POT1, TPP1, and RAP1.[11] In many species, the sequence repeats are enriched in guanine, e.g. TTAGGG in vertebrates,[12] which allows the formation of G-quadruplexes, a special conformation of DNA involving non-Watson-Crick base pairing. There are different subtypes depending on the involvement of single- or double-stranded DNA, among other things. There is evidence for the 3'-overhang in ciliates (that possess telomere repeats similar to those found in vertebrates) to form such G-quadruplexes that accommodate it, rather than a T-loop. G-quadruplexes present an obstacle for enzymes such as DNA-polymerases and are thus thought to be involved in the regulation of replication and transcription.[13]


Synthesis of chromosome ends by telomerase

Many organisms have an ribonucleoprotein enzyme called telomerase, which carries out the task of adding repetitive nucleotide sequences to the ends of the DNA. Telomerase "replenishes" the telomere "cap" and requires no ATP[14] In most multicellular eukaryotic organisms, telomerase is active only in germ cells, some types of stem cells such as embryonic stem cells, and certain white blood cells. Telomerase can be reactivated and telomeres reset back to an embryonic state by somatic cell nuclear transfer.[15] The steady shortening of telomeres with each replication in somatic (body) cells may have a role in senescence[16] and in the prevention of cancer.[17][18] This is because the telomeres act as a sort of time-delay "fuse", eventually running out after a certain number of cell divisions and resulting in the eventual loss of vital genetic information from the cell's chromosome with future divisions.[19] [20]


Telomere length varies greatly between species, from approximately 300 base pairs in yeast[21] to many kilobases in humans, and usually is composed of arrays of guanine-rich, six- to eight-base-pair-long repeats. Eukaryotic telomeres normally terminate with 3′ single-stranded-DNA overhang ranging from 75-300 bases, which is essential for telomere maintenance and capping. Multiple proteins binding single- and double-stranded telomere DNA have been identified.[22] These function in both telomere maintenance and capping. Telomeres form large loop structures called telomere loops, or T-loops. Here, the single-stranded DNA curls around in a long circle, stabilized by telomere-binding proteins.[23] At the very end of the T-loop, the single-stranded telomere DNA is held onto a region of double-stranded DNA by the telomere strand disrupting the double-helical DNA, and base pairing to one of the two strands. This triple-stranded structure is called a displacement loop or D-loop.[24]


Oxidative damageEdit

Apart from the end replication problem, in vitro studies have shown that telomeres accumulate damage due to oxidative stress and that oxidative stress-mediated DNA damage has a major influence on telomere shortening in vivo. There is a multitude of ways in which oxidative stress, mediated by reactive oxygen species (ROS), can lead to DNA damage; however, it is yet unclear whether the elevated rate in telomeres is brought about by their inherent susceptibility or a diminished activity of DNA repair systems in these regions.[25] Despite widespread agreement of the findings, widespread flaws regarding measurement and sampling have been pointed out; for example, a suspected species and tissue dependency of oxidative damage to telomeres is said to be insufficiently accounted for.[26] Population-based studies have indicated an interaction between anti-oxidant intake and telomere length. In the Long Island Breast Cancer Study Project (LIBCSP), authors found a moderate increase in breast cancer risk among women with the shortest telomeres and lower dietary intake of beta carotene, vitamin C or E.[27] These results [28] suggest that cancer risk due to telomere shortening may interact with other mechanisms of DNA damage, specifically oxidative stress.

Association with agingEdit

Telomere shortening is associated with aging, mortality, and aging-related diseases. Based upon comparison between individuals of different ages, telomere length is negatively associated with the number of cell divisions in germ and tumor cells. This leads to the link between age and telomere length, as one might expect, the older an individual is the more times their cells have replicated their genome and divided. In contrast to humans, mice have been demonstrated to have significantly longer telomeres. This could demonstrate how the effects of telomere shortening might have a different or no effect on other eukaryotes, as the older mice had no significant difference in telomere length than younger mice.[4] Furthermore, the role and importance of telomeres appears to have varying degrees of importance among model organisms. Common model organisms such as mice, S. cerevisiae, and C. elegans, were able to withstand the knockdown of telomerase with little effect for multiple generations. Despite the resiliency of these eukaryotes, a decrease in telomerase function in humans resulted in multiple threatening complications after only a few generations.[4] This carries implications on the importance of preserving telomeres in human health.

The age of a father plays a role in the length of a child's telomeres, which has evolutionary implications. Although leukocyte telomeres shorten with age, sperm telomeres lengthen with age. Shorter telomeres are theorized to impose lower energy costs (due to less replication) but also have immune system-related and other aging- and disease-related costs, so the effect of paternal age on telomere length might be an adaptation to increase the chances that the child will be fit for the environment they're born into.[29][30] Telomerase is normally triggered by cancer cells, however in some cases, cancer cells use a mechanism called alternative telomere lengthening to retain telomeres.[citation needed]

Potential effect of psychological stressEdit

Meta-analyses found that increased perceived psychological stress was associated with a small decrease in telomere length—but that these associations attenuate to no significant association when accounting for publication bias. The literature concerning telomeres as integrative biomarkers of exposure to stress and adversity is dominated by cross-sectional and correlational studies, which makes causal interpretation problematic.[28][31] A 2020 review argued that the relationship between psychosocial stress and telomere length appears strongest for stress experienced in utero or early life.[32]


The average cell will divide between 50 and 70 times before cell death. As the cell divides the telomeres on the end of the chromosome get smaller. The Hayflick limit is the theoretical limit to the number of times a cell may divide until the telomere becomes so short that division is inhibited and the cell enters senescence.

The phenomenon of limited cellular division was first observed by Leonard Hayflick, and is now referred to as the Hayflick limit.[33][34] Significant discoveries were subsequently made by a group of scientists organized at Geron Corporation by Geron's founder Michael D. West, that tied telomere shortening with the Hayflick limit.[35] The cloning of the catalytic component of telomerase enabled experiments to test whether the expression of telomerase at levels sufficient to prevent telomere shortening was capable of immortalizing human cells. Telomerase was demonstrated in a 1998 publication in Science to be capable of extending cell lifespan, and now is well-recognized as capable of immortalizing human somatic cells.[36]

Two studies on long-lived seabirds demonstrate that the role of telomeres is far from being understood. In 2003, scientists observed that the telomeres of Leach's storm-petrel (Oceanodroma leucorhoa) seem to lengthen with chronological age, the first observed instance of such behaviour of telomeres.[37]

A study reported that telomere length of different mammalian species correlates inversely rather than directly with lifespan, and concluded that the contribution of telomere length to lifespan remains controversial.[38] There is little evidence that, in humans, telomere length is a significant biomarker of normal aging with respect to important cognitive and physical abilities.[39]


Known, up-to-date telomere nucleotide sequences are listed in Telomerase Database website.

Some known telomere nucleotide sequences
Group Organism Telomeric repeat (5' to 3' toward the end)
Vertebrates Human, mouse, Xenopus TTAGGG
Filamentous fungi Neurospora crassa TTAGGG
Slime moulds Physarum, Didymium TTAGGG
Dictyostelium AG(1-8)
Kinetoplastid protozoa Trypanosoma, Crithidia TTAGGG
Ciliate protozoa Tetrahymena, Glaucoma TTGGGG
Paramecium TTGGG(T/G)
Oxytricha, Stylonychia, Euplotes TTTTGGGG
Apicomplexan protozoa Plasmodium TTAGGG(T/C)
Higher plants Arabidopsis thaliana TTTAGGG
Cestrum elegans TTTTTTAGGG[40]
Green algae Chlamydomonas TTTTAGGG
Insects Bombyx mori TTAGG
Roundworms Ascaris lumbricoides TTAGGC
Fission yeasts Schizosaccharomyces pombe TTAC(A)(C)G(1-8)
Budding yeasts Saccharomyces cerevisiae TGTGGGTGTGGTG (from RNA template)
or G(2-3)(TG)(1-6)T (consensus)
Saccharomyces castellii TCTGGGTG
Candida glabrata GGGGTCTGGGTGCTG
Candida guillermondii GGTGTAC

Research on disease riskEdit

Telomeres are critical for maintaining genomic integrity and may be factors for age-related diseases. Laboratory studies show that telomere dysfunction or shortening is commonly acquired due the process of cellular aging and tumor development. The function of telomeres is widely accepted as a buffer against tumor growth, to protect chromosome structure, and prevent the loss of vital genetic information during replication. While telomeres keep the growth and division of somatic cells in check, this can inadvertently select for rapidly dividing cells that have suffered telomere damage. As other cells divide as they are supposed to, the abnormal cells divide much quicker, outcompeting the undamaged cells, while acquiring more DNA damage that could further increase their ability to grow.[4] This results in tumor formation.

Certain lifestyle factors have been shown to prematurely shorten telomere length. Smoking is negatively correlated to telomere length. The average human loses roughly 25-27 base pairs per year due to telomere shortening. A study of telomere length in white blood cells of chronic smokers revealed an additional 5 base pairs lost per year. Obesity is another factor that contributes to accelerated telomere shortening. It is well established that obesity causes increased oxidative stress. Ultimately, this increased oxidative damage can impair DNA and, consequently, reduce telomere length. Furthermore, dietary intake and physical activity decrease the rate of telomere shortening. An increase in consumption of antioxidants such as omega-3 fatty acids, vitamins E, C, and beta-carotene can reduce oxidative stress on DNA. Women with diets consisting of a high intake of these antioxidants revealed longer telomere length and a decreased risk in breast cancer. In relation to obesity, exercise promotes metabolization of fat and detrimental waste products, as well as increases the activity of telomerase. Moreover, physical activity decreases the expression of proteins associated with apoptosis (p53 and p16) in mice populations, which indicates reduced levels of oxidative stress and thereby telomere shortening.

Observational studies have found shortened telomeres in many types of experimental cancers. In addition, people with cancer have been found to possess shorter leukocyte telomeres than healthy controls. In 2011, meta-analyses suggested 1.4 to 3.0 fold increased risk of cancer for those with the shortest vs. longest telomeres.

Telomeres also exist as a possible drug target. While telomeres serve a vital function in humans, telomerase activity is generally low in most somatic cells and tissues. This provides a unique avenue for targeting eukaryotic pathogens. There are many parasitic strains of eukaryotes such as protozoans and infectious yeast that heavily rely upon telomerase activity to monitor their genome. Since normal telomerase activity in most human cells is low, targeting parasitic telomerase function might be a successful short-term treatment against pathogenic eukaryotes, without causing harm to the host.[4]


Several techniques are currently employed to assess average telomere length in eukaryotic cells. One method is the Terminal Restriction Fragment (TRF) southern blot.[42][43] A Real-Time PCR assay for telomere length involves determining the Telomere-to-Single Copy Gene (T/S) ratio, which is demonstrated to be proportional to the average telomere length in a cell.[44]

Tools have also been developed to estimate the length of telomere from whole genome sequencing (WGS) experiments. Amongst these are TelSeq,[45] Telomerecat[46] and telomereHunter.[47] Length estimation from WGS typically works by differentiating telomere sequencing reads and then inferring the length of telomere that produced that number of reads. These methods have been shown to correlate with preexisting methods of estimation such as PCR and TRF. Flow-FISH is used to quantify the length of telomeres in human white blood cells. A semi-automated method for measuring the average length of telomeres with Flow FISH was published in Nature Protocols in 2006.[48]

While multiple companies offer telomere length measurement services, the utility of these measurements for widespread clinical or personal use has been questioned.[49][50] Nobel Prize winner Elizabeth Blackburn, who was co-founder of one company, promoted the clinical utility of telomere length measures.[51]

In wildlifeEdit

During the last two decades, eco-evolutionary studies have investigated the relevance of life-history traits and environmental conditions on telomeres of wildlife. Most of these studies have been conducted in endotherms, i.e. birds and mammals. They have provided evidence for the inheritance of telomere length; however, heritability estimates vary greatly within and among species.[52] Age and telomere length often negatively correlate in vertebrates, but this decline is variable among taxa and linked to the method used for estimating telomere length.[53] In contrast, the available information shows no sex differences in telomere length across vertebrates.[54] Phylogeny and life history traits such as body size or the pace of life can also affect telomere dynamics. For example, it has been described across species of birds[55] and mammals.[56] In 2019, a meta-analysis confirmed that the exposure to stressors (e.g. pathogen infection, competition, reproductive effort and high activity level) was associated with shorter telomeres across different animal taxa.[57] Telomeres are also a candidate health biomarker for ecotoxicology studies, however, their use still needs further validation as the current literature is taxonomically biased and limited by a reduced number of experimental and longitudinal approaches.[58]

Although ca. 80% of living animals are ectotherms, the knowledge about telomere dynamics in these species is still limited to a few studies in reptiles, fish, and amphibians, whereas invertebrates telomeres have been virtually not explored.[59] Ectotherms are significantly more likely than endotherms to have variation in somatic telomerase expression. For instance, in many fish, telomerase occurs throughout the body (and associated with this, telomere length is roughly the same across all its tissue). Studies on ectotherms, and other non-mammalian organisms, show that there is no single universal model of telomere erosion; rather, there is wide variation in relevant dynamics across Metazoa, and even within smaller taxonomic groups these patterns appear diverse. Due to the different reproductive timelines of some ectotherms, selection on disease is relevant for a much larger fraction of these creatures’ lives than it is for mammals, so early- and late-life telomere length, and their possible links to cancer, seem especially important in these species from a life history theory point of view.[59] Indeed, ectotherms are more sensitive to environmental variation than endotherms and factors such as temperature are known to their growth and maturation rates, thus, ectothermic telomeres are predicted to be greatly affected by climate change.[60]

See alsoEdit


  1. ^ During replication, multiple DNA-polymerases are involved.


  1. ^ Olovnikov, A. M. (1971). "[Principle of marginotomy in template synthesis of polynucleotides]". Doklady Akademii nauk SSSR. 201 (6): 1496–1499. ISSN 0002-3264. PMID 5158754.
  2. ^ Olovnikov, A. M. (1973-09-14). "A theory of marginotomy: The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 41 (1): 181–190. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(73)90198-7. ISSN 0022-5193.
  3. ^ Olovnikov, A. M. (1996). "Telomeres, telomerase, and aging: origin of the theory". Experimental Gerontology. 31 (4): 443–448. doi:10.1016/0531-5565(96)00005-8. ISSN 0531-5565. PMID 9415101.
  4. ^ a b c d e Blackburn EH, Gall JG (March 1978). "A tandemly repeated sequence at the termini of the extrachromosomal ribosomal RNA genes in Tetrahymena". Journal of Molecular Biology. 120 (1): 33–53. doi:10.1016/0022-2836(78)90294-2. PMID 642006.
  5. ^ "Elizabeth H. Blackburn, Carol W. Greider, Jack W. Szostak: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 2009". Nobel Foundation. 2009-10-05. Retrieved 2012-06-12.
  6. ^ "Barbara McClintock: The Nobel Prize in Physiology or Medicine 1983". Nobel Foundation. 1983. Retrieved 10 March 2018.
  7. ^ Olovnikov AM (September 1973). "A theory of marginotomy. The incomplete copying of template margin in enzymic synthesis of polynucleotides and biological significance of the phenomenon". Journal of Theoretical Biology. 41 (1): 181–90. Bibcode:1973JThBi..41..181O. doi:10.1016/0022-5193(73)90198-7. PMID 4754905.
  8. ^ Chow TT, Zhao Y, Mak SS, Shay JW, Wright WE (June 2012). "Early and late steps in telomere overhang processing in normal human cells: the position of the final RNA primer drives telomere shortening". Genes & Development. 26 (11): 1167–78. doi:10.1101/gad.187211.112. PMC 3371406. PMID 22661228.
  9. ^ Nelson DL, Lehninger AL, Cox MM (2008). Lehninger principles of biochemistry (5th ed.). New York: W.H. Freeman. ISBN 9780716771081. OCLC 191854286.
  10. ^ Maloy S (July 12, 2002). "Bacterial Chromosome Structure". Retrieved 2008-06-22.
  11. ^ Martínez P, Blasco MA (October 2010). "Role of shelterin in cancer and aging". Aging Cell. 9 (5): 653–66. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2010.00596.x. PMID 20569239.
  12. ^ Meyne J, Ratliff RL, Moyzis RK (September 1989). "Conservation of the human telomere sequence (TTAGGG)n among vertebrates". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 86 (18): 7049–53. Bibcode:1989PNAS...86.7049M. doi:10.1073/pnas.86.18.7049. PMC 297991. PMID 2780561.
  13. ^ Lipps HJ, Rhodes D (August 2009). "G-quadruplex structures: in vivo evidence and function". Trends in Cell Biology. 19 (8): 414–22. doi:10.1016/j.tcb.2009.05.002. PMID 19589679.
  14. ^ Mender I, Shay JW (November 2015). "Telomerase Repeated Amplification Protocol (TRAP)". Bio-Protocol. 5 (22): e1657. doi:10.21769/bioprotoc.1657. PMC 4863463. PMID 27182535.
  15. ^ Lanza RP, Cibelli JB, Blackwell C, Cristofalo VJ, Francis MK, Baerlocher GM, et al. (April 2000). "Extension of cell life-span and telomere length in animals cloned from senescent somatic cells". Science. 288 (5466): 665–9. Bibcode:2000Sci...288..665L. doi:10.1126/science.288.5466.665. PMID 10784448. S2CID 37387314.
  16. ^ Whittemore, Kurt; Vera, Elsa; Martínez-Nevado, Eva; Sanpera, Carola; Blasco, Maria A. (2019). "Telomere shortening rate predicts species life span". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 116 (30): 15122–15127. doi:10.1073/pnas.1902452116. ISSN 0027-8424. PMC 6660761. PMID 31285335.
  17. ^ Shay JW, Wright WE (May 2005). "Senescence and immortalization: role of telomeres and telomerase". Carcinogenesis. 26 (5): 867–74. doi:10.1093/carcin/bgh296. PMID 15471900.
  18. ^ Wai LK (July 2004). "Telomeres, telomerase, and tumorigenesis--a review". MedGenMed. 6 (3): 19. PMC 1435592. PMID 15520642.
  19. ^ Greider CW (August 1990). "Telomeres, telomerase and senescence". BioEssays. 12 (8): 363–9. doi:10.1002/bies.950120803. PMID 2241933. S2CID 11920124.
  20. ^ Barnes, R.P., de Rosa, M., Thosar, S.A., et al., Telomeric 8-oxo-guanine drives rapid premature senescence in the absence of telomere shortening, Nature, June 30, 2022; Nat Struct Mol Biol 29, 639–652 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41594-022-00790-y
  21. ^ Shampay J, Szostak JW, Blackburn EH (1984). "DNA sequences of telomeres maintained in yeast". Nature. 310 (5973): 154–7. Bibcode:1984Natur.310..154S. doi:10.1038/310154a0. PMID 6330571. S2CID 4360698.
  22. ^ Williams TL, Levy DL, Maki-Yonekura S, Yonekura K, Blackburn EH (November 2010). "Characterization of the yeast telomere nucleoprotein core: Rap1 binds independently to each recognition site". The Journal of Biological Chemistry. 285 (46): 35814–24. doi:10.1074/jbc.M110.170167. PMC 2975205. PMID 20826803.
  23. ^ Griffith JD, Comeau L, Rosenfield S, Stansel RM, Bianchi A, Moss H, de Lange T (May 1999). "Mammalian telomeres end in a large duplex loop". Cell. 97 (4): 503–14. doi:10.1016/S0092-8674(00)80760-6. PMID 10338214. S2CID 721901.
  24. ^ Burge S, Parkinson GN, Hazel P, Todd AK, Neidle S (2006). "Quadruplex DNA: sequence, topology and structure". Nucleic Acids Research. 34 (19): 5402–15. doi:10.1093/nar/gkl655. PMC 1636468. PMID 17012276.
  25. ^ Barnes R, Fouquerel E, Opresko P (2019). "The impact of oxidative DNA damage and stress on telomere homeostasis". Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 177: 37–45. doi:10.1016/j.mad.2018.03.013. PMC 6162185. PMID 29604323.
  26. ^ Reichert S, Stier A (December 2017). "Does oxidative stress shorten telomeres in vivo? A review". Biology Letters. 13 (12): 20170463. doi:10.1098/rsbl.2017.0463. PMC 5746531. PMID 29212750.
  27. ^ Shen J, Gammon MD, Terry MB, Wang Q, Bradshaw P, Teitelbaum SL, et al. (April 2009). "Telomere length, oxidative damage, antioxidants and breast cancer risk". International Journal of Cancer. 124 (7): 1637–43. doi:10.1002/ijc.24105. PMC 2727686. PMID 19089916.
  28. ^ a b Mathur MB, Epel E, Kind S, Desai M, Parks CG, Sandler DP, Khazeni N (May 2016). "Perceived stress and telomere length: A systematic review, meta-analysis, and methodologic considerations for advancing the field". Brain, Behavior, and Immunity. 54: 158–169. doi:10.1016/j.bbi.2016.02.002. PMC 5590630. PMID 26853993.
  29. ^ Eisenberg DT (17 December 2010). "An evolutionary review of human telomere biology: the thrifty telomere hypothesis and notes on potential adaptive paternal effects". American Journal of Human Biology. 23 (2): 149–67. doi:10.1002/ajhb.21127. PMID 21319244. S2CID 5540894.
  30. ^ Aston KI, Hunt SC, Susser E, Kimura M, Factor-Litvak P, Carrell D, Aviv A (November 2012). "Divergence of sperm and leukocyte age-dependent telomere dynamics: implications for male-driven evolution of telomere length in humans". Molecular Human Reproduction. 18 (11): 517–22. doi:10.1093/molehr/gas028. PMC 3480822. PMID 22782639.
  31. ^ Pepper GV, Bateson M, Nettle D (August 2018). "Telomeres as integrative markers of exposure to stress and adversity: a systematic review and meta-analysis". Royal Society Open Science. 5 (8): 180744. Bibcode:2018RSOS....580744P. doi:10.1098/rsos.180744. PMC 6124068. PMID 30225068.
  32. ^ Rentscher KE, Carroll JE, Mitchell C (April 2020). "Psychosocial Stressors and Telomere Length: A Current Review of the Science". Annual Review of Public Health. 41: 223–245. doi:10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040119-094239. PMID 31900099.
  33. ^ Hayflick L, Moorhead PS (December 1961). "The serial cultivation of human diploid cell strains". Experimental Cell Research. 25 (3): 585–621. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(61)90192-6. PMID 13905658.
  34. ^ Hayflick L (March 1965). "The limited in vitro lifetime of human diploid cell strains". Experimental Cell Research. 37 (3): 614–36. doi:10.1016/0014-4827(65)90211-9. PMID 14315085.
  35. ^ Feng J, Funk WD, Wang SS, Weinrich SL, Avilion AA, Chiu CP, et al. (September 1995). "The RNA component of human telomerase". Science. 269 (5228): 1236–41. Bibcode:1995Sci...269.1236F. doi:10.1126/science.7544491. PMID 7544491. S2CID 9440710.
  36. ^ Bodnar AG, Ouellette M, Frolkis M, Holt SE, Chiu CP, Morin GB, et al. (January 1998). "Extension of life-span by introduction of telomerase into normal human cells". Science. 279 (5349): 349–52. Bibcode:1998Sci...279..349B. doi:10.1126/science.279.5349.349. PMID 9454332. S2CID 35667874.
  37. ^ Nakagawa S, Gemmell NJ, Burke T (September 2004). "Measuring vertebrate telomeres: applications and limitations" (PDF). Molecular Ecology. 13 (9): 2523–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294X.2004.02291.x. PMID 15315667. S2CID 13841086.
  38. ^ Gomes NM, Ryder OA, Houck ML, Charter SJ, Walker W, Forsyth NR, et al. (October 2011). "Comparative biology of mammalian telomeres: hypotheses on ancestral states and the roles of telomeres in longevity determination". Aging Cell. 10 (5): 761–8. doi:10.1111/j.1474-9726.2011.00718.x. PMC 3387546. PMID 21518243.
  39. ^ Harris SE, Martin-Ruiz C, von Zglinicki T, Starr JM, Deary IJ (July 2012). "Telomere length and aging biomarkers in 70-year-olds: the Lothian Birth Cohort 1936". Neurobiology of Aging. 33 (7): 1486.e3–8. doi:10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.11.013. PMID 21194798. S2CID 10309423.
  40. ^ Peška V, Fajkus P, Fojtová M, Dvořáčková M, Hapala J, Dvořáček V, et al. (May 2015). "Characterisation of an unusual telomere motif (TTTTTTAGGG)n in the plant Cestrum elegans (Solanaceae), a species with a large genome". The Plant Journal. 82 (4): 644–54. doi:10.1111/tpj.12839. PMID 25828846.
  41. ^ Fajkus P, Peška V, Sitová Z, Fulnečková J, Dvořáčková M, Gogela R, et al. (February 2016). "Allium telomeres unmasked: the unusual telomeric sequence (CTCGGTTATGGG)n is synthesized by telomerase". The Plant Journal. 85 (3): 337–47. doi:10.1111/tpj.13115. PMID 26716914. S2CID 206331112.
  42. ^ Allshire RC, et al. (June 1989). "Human telomeres contain at least three types of G-rich repeat distributed non-randomly". Nucleic Acids Research. 17 (12): 4611–27. doi:10.1093/nar/17.12.4611. PMC 318019. PMID 2664709.
  43. ^ Rufer N, et al. (August 1998). "Telomere length dynamics in human lymphocyte subpopulations measured by flow cytometry". Nature Biotechnology. 16 (8): 743–7. doi:10.1038/nbt0898-743. PMID 9702772. S2CID 23833545.
  44. ^ Cawthon RM (May 2002). "Telomere measurement by quantitative PCR". Nucleic Acids Research. 30 (10): 47e–47. doi:10.1093/nar/30.10.e47. PMC 115301. PMID 12000852.
  45. ^ Ding Z (2014). "Estimating telomere length from whole genome sequence data". Nucleic Acids Research. 42 (9): e75. doi:10.1093/nar/gku181. PMC 4027178. PMID 24609383.
  46. ^ Farmery J (2018). "Telomerecat: A ploidy-agnostic method for estimating telomere length from whole genome sequencing data". Scientific Reports. 8 (1): 1300. Bibcode:2018NatSR...8.1300F. doi:10.1038/s41598-017-14403-y. PMC 5778012. PMID 29358629.
  47. ^ Feuerbach L (2019). "TelomereHunter–in silico estimation of telomere content and composition from cancer genomes". BMC Bioinformatics. 20 (1): 272. doi:10.1186/s12859-019-2851-0. PMC 6540518. PMID 31138115.
  48. ^ Baerlocher GM, Vulto I, de Jong G, Lansdorp PM (December 2006). "Flow cytometry and FISH to measure the average length of telomeres (flow FISH)". Nature Protocols. 1 (5): 2365–76. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.263. PMID 17406480. S2CID 20463557.
  49. ^ Pollack, Andrew (May 18, 2011). "A Blood Test Offers Clues to Longevity". The New York Times.
  50. ^ von Zglinicki T (March 2012). "Will your telomeres tell your future?". BMJ. 344: e1727. doi:10.1136/bmj.e1727. PMID 22415954. S2CID 44594597.
  51. ^ Marchant J (2011). "Spit test offers guide to health". Nature. doi:10.1038/news.2011.330.
  52. ^ Dugdale, Hannah L.; Richardson, David S. (2018-01-15). "Heritability of telomere variation: it is all about the environment!". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 373 (1741): 20160450. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0450. ISSN 0962-8436. PMC 5784070. PMID 29335377.
  53. ^ Remot, Florentin; Ronget, Victor; Froy, Hannah; Rey, Benjamin; Gaillard, Jean‐Michel; Nussey, Daniel H.; Lemaitre, Jean‐François (2021-09-07). "Decline in telomere length with increasing age across nonhuman vertebrates: A meta‐analysis". Molecular Ecology. 31 (23): 5917–5932. doi:10.1111/mec.16145. hdl:20.500.11820/91f3fc9e-4a69-4ac4-a8a0-45c93ccbf3b5. ISSN 0962-1083. PMID 34437736. S2CID 237328316.
  54. ^ Remot, Florentin; Ronget, Victor; Froy, Hannah; Rey, Benjamin; Gaillard, Jean-Michel; Nussey, Daniel H.; Lemaître, Jean-François (November 2020). "No sex differences in adult telomere length across vertebrates: a meta-analysis". Royal Society Open Science. 7 (11): 200548. Bibcode:2020RSOS....700548R. doi:10.1098/rsos.200548. ISSN 2054-5703. PMC 7735339. PMID 33391781. S2CID 226291119.
  55. ^ Criscuolo, François; Dobson, F. Stephen; Schull, Quentin (2021-06-07). "The influence of phylogeny and life history on telomere lengths and telomere rate of change among bird species: a meta-analysis". dx.doi.org. doi:10.22541/au.162308930.07224518/v1. S2CID 236292744. Retrieved 2021-09-24.
  56. ^ Pepke, Michael Le; Eisenberg, Dan T. A. (2021-03-16). "On the comparative biology of mammalian telomeres: Telomere length co‐evolves with body mass, lifespan and cancer risk". Molecular Ecology. 31 (23): 6286–6296. doi:10.1111/mec.15870. ISSN 0962-1083. PMID 33662151.
  57. ^ Chatelain, Marion; Drobniak, Szymon M.; Szulkin, Marta (2019-11-27). "The association between stressors and telomeres in non‐human vertebrates: a meta‐analysis". Ecology Letters. 23 (2): 381–398. doi:10.1111/ele.13426. ISSN 1461-023X. PMID 31773847. S2CID 208319503.
  58. ^ Louzon, Maxime; Coeurdassier, Michael; Gimbert, Frédéric; Pauget, Benjamin; de Vaufleury, Annette (October 2019). "Telomere dynamic in humans and animals: Review and perspectives in environmental toxicology". Environment International. 131: 105025. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2019.105025. ISSN 0160-4120. PMID 31352262.
  59. ^ a b Olsson M, Wapstra E, Friesen C (March 2018). "Ectothermic telomeres: it's time they came in from the cold". Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences. 373 (1741): 20160449. doi:10.1098/rstb.2016.0449. PMC 5784069. PMID 29335373.
  60. ^ B., Burraco, Pablo Orizaola, German Monaghan, Pat Metcalfe, Neil (2020). "Climate change and ageing in ectotherms". Global Change Biology. Uppsala universitet, Zooekologi. 26 (10): 5371–5381. Bibcode:2020GCBio..26.5371B. doi:10.1111/gcb.15305. OCLC 1248702976. PMID 32835446. S2CID 221306289.

External linksEdit