Talk:Zuma Rock

Add topic
Active discussions
WikiProject Nigeria (Rated Stub-class, Mid-importance)
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Nigeria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Nigeria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Mid  This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.
WikiProject Geology (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject iconZuma Rock is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

What I'd like to add to Zuma rockEdit

The beauty about Zuma rock isn't just the fact that it is a monolith, but also because of the power the Nigerians believe it has. If anyone takes a closer look at it, they would notice that there is an image of a face planted on it. There are no references as to how it came to be, but Nigerians do believe that becuase of the face, Zuma rock has some mystical and magical powers. I also want to add how the Nigerian government has tried to turn it into a national touristic site but have failed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lethalskillz (talkcontribs) 16:16, 14 October 2012 (UTC)

A face planted on it? You mean a naturally occurring image -- like the "man on the moon"? Geo Swan (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

Is this rock of volcanic origin?Edit

Is this rock originally of volcanic origin?

How old is it? Geo Swan (talk) 17:36, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

External links modifiedEdit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Zuma Rock. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:36, 21 July 2016 (UTC)


The height of the rock is given, without a source, in this article as 725 metres and in the Abuja article (again without a source) as 792 metres. A quick google provides figures (all in sources I don't think are reliable or likely sourced from Wikipedia) of "about 700 metres", "3,690 feet and 11.3 inches (1,130 metres)" (fairly obviously an overly exact conversion from metres), "623 ft", and "2,378 feet". I haven't found anything definitive yet and I'm not awake enough to continue looking. Thryduulf (talk) 02:53, 19 November 2016 (UTC)

Well, according to (enter "Zuma Rock") the altitude above sea level of Zuma Rock is just above 700 metres. With the circumference of 3.1 km the diameter is about 1 km. Considering the ratio of diameter (or width) and height and checking the photographs, it is fairly obvious that the height is less than stated now in the article. The same is true for a check-up with Google Earth which is inaccurate but seems to prove the point that the altitude above sea level is not 1125 metres but much less. I'm also getting tired now. There must be some kind of curse surrounding this rock. I hope Thryduulf is okay... --Vanellus (talk) 20:42, 9 April 2019 (UTC)