Talk:Zi Teng

Latest comment: 7 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

November 2006

edit

Hi Fang Aili, can you kindly elaborate what does the fair use rationale mean? Thanks.

0101andyho06 05:46, 5 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Amidst all the discussions and editings, the 7.4- T shirt remains strangly unnoticed, hiding under the "publications" header. Is it of any relevance?

In addition, I find the table of sexual services rather inappropriate. If I want to know about the price, and places for whatever services, I wouldn't have searched for Zi Teng. Deleting it.

0101andyho06 15:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


Hi guys, Please try and shorten section 1.2 0101hannah06 07:26, 3 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

I feel the same way too. It only provides some extra information on the prosecution of sex crimes and should not occupy such a large proportion of the page. We may just leave the subheadings in place, like 'Trafficking in persons to or from Hong Kong', 'Interpretation:SEXUAL AND RELATED OFFENCES', and delete the content underneath, okay?

--0101morris06 15:19, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


Regarding to Andy Ho's comment, I absolutely agree with what he said. I think the part of prostition laws in HK is quite irrelevant in the page of Ziteng. the laws could serves as a background information, but not like quoting the whole page of law here. Instead, we could add an external link for those laws in another wiki page.

--0101betty06 06:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply


With regards to the profile of sex workers in Hong Kong, I feel that it needs to be removed as it deviates from the Ziteng organisation, who's main role is to promote a better understanding of the people it supports and care for. The profile of sex workers in Hong Kong should be under a different subject.

Events needs description.

T shirts should not be under publications

0101andyho06 06:51, 25 October 2006 (UTC)0101andyho06Reply

edit

Please review WP:EL and reduce the number of links accordingly. Most of them are not relevant enough for this article (they might be fine for other articles). Thank you, Kusma (討論) 20:43, 31 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Fair use images

edit

To whom it may concern, the fair use images in this article need fair use rationales. If they aren't added after 7 days the images will be deleted. Cheers, Fang Aili talk 20:29, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

English Translation

edit

Zi Teng translates as Wisteria sinensis, not Acorus calamus as stated in the article. Is there a misunderstanding here, or shall I change it?217.43.226.218 (talk) 12:55, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I've put in an 'other sources say...' qualification. I guess that's the best we can do unless the organisation themselves correct their website.217.43.226.218 (talk) 13:24, 30 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Zi Teng. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:48, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply