This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Worcestershire, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Worcestershire-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WorcestershireWikipedia:WikiProject WorcestershireTemplate:WikiProject WorcestershireWorcestershire articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
I've been going through UK cities adding pronunciations where necessary. However this one I do not know how to pronounce. Anyone know? Grover cleveland (talk) 05:16, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
According to here it's "witch-avon". But it doesn't say where the stress is. kwami (talk) 09:50, 13 June 2009 (UTC)Reply
The pronunciation witch-ayvon is correct. Generally all three syllables are accorded equal stress unless intoning a question or element of surprise, etc.--Kudpung (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This article is a high priority requirement within the scope of the Worcester Project and needs to be significantly expanded. Please see the Malvern Hills (district) article as an example, or to use it for a model.--Kudpung (talk) 11:17, 4 July 2009 (UTC)Reply