Talk:Winston & Strawn
Latest comment: 4 years ago by 147.126.81.6 in topic Evidence of bias
 | The contents of the Breed, Abbott & Morgan page were merged into Winston & Strawn on 11 March 2020. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| Breed, Abbott & Morgan was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 10 March 2020 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Winston & Strawn. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evidence of bias edit
Hi. Much of the content appears to be biased and promotional. I would recommend looking for sources that go beyond the firm's website for some of the facts presented here. Coffee312 (talk) 20:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Hello, I agree with Coffee312's response. It's extremely promotional. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 147.126.81.6 (talk) 15:46, 25 September 2019 (UTC)