Talk:Willie Wilcox
 | Individuals with a conflict of interest, particularly those representing the subject of the article, are strongly advised not to directly edit the article. See Wikipedia:Conflict of interest. You may request corrections or suggest content here on the Talk page for independent editors to review, or contact us if the issue is urgent. |
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Article cleanup after copyedit, and potential rewrite
editThis article came to my attention when looking through the copyedit backlogs as part of the GOCE Copy Editing Project Blitz. It appeared at first to be a decently harmless page that had some grammatical and punctuation issues, but it's a great deal more than that.
For one, the article's Biography section is not only poorly written in regards to Wikipedia's Manual of Style, it's entirely unsourced and looks like a good example of WP:BLPSELFPUB. The whole section lacks consistency and cohesion, and along with being unsourced, feels difficult to keep in the article entirely. It also almost entirely lacked wikilinks before my edit, and still likely has some I missed.
Additionally, the Equipment section is dubious and doesn't feel like it fits within a personal article about a person, and would fit better as either part of a band page or on pages related to the companies that produce the equipment used. I have already removed a couple of sections for feeling too close to endorsement or advertising, but as a whole I personally find it difficult to justify this section as part of the article.
Overall I feel like this article could do with being rewritten, but actually including reliable, secondary sources. If it weren't for the already existing sources helping this article cling to WP:SIGCOV by a thread, I wouldn't be opposed to deletion. However, I feel like there's enough coverage in existing references and that exist in reliable publications upon a cursory search that this article can remain, but it urgently needs to be written from scratch and ideally not have a significant portion written by (presumably) either the person in question, or someone related to them. SmittenGalaxy (talk) 22:14, 17 June 2024 (UTC)