Talk:William Wailes

Sorting out info

How does one know whether any of the information added to a page is valuable when the ridiculous person first blanks the page, then deletes factual stuff and leaves hanging prepositions, inserts information about Style under Biography, Deletes valid information about Style and in its place inserts material pertaining to a period 500 years earlier?

--Amandajm 00:34, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

List of churches

The list is potentially very long, and at the moment is not in any particular order and not all entries are referenced. Would it be better as a realated /list article rather than in the main article? --Robert EA Harvey (talk) 12:53, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on William Wailes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100513132330/http://1066.co.nz/library/queens2/queens2.txt to http://www.1066.co.nz/library/queens2/queens2.txt
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.stainedglassrecords.org/home
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061008182742/http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/articles/VictorianBuildings/Architects.htm to http://www.localhistory.scit.wlv.ac.uk/articles/VictorianBuildings/Architects.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:34, 4 January 2018 (UTC)