Talk:William C. Cramer

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Parkwells in topic Too much on 1970 campaign/election

Needs editing

edit

The article seems immersed in intra-party politics, with excessive quotes about "who said what about whom," more than is typical for a biographical article. Some of this material can be reduced, with a focus on the results of the rivalries, rather than step-by-step discussion.Parkwells (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Needs more sources

edit

The article relies too heavily on one political analysis article, the source of many quotes about who said what. Needs more distant perspective and additional RS.Parkwells (talk) 16:27, 4 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

The balance of the article needs to be changed so that it is not simply a summary of Hathorn's analysis of the effects of the Cramer-Gurney dispute on state Republican politics, but is a more general bio of Cramer.Parkwells (talk) 14:15, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Too much on 1970 campaign/election

edit

In the interests of a biographical article, this section needs to be reduced and edited. This article is not supposed to be a repetition of the analysis of the effects of the dispute on Republican politics in the state.Parkwells (talk) 15:38, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply