Talk:Wilco (The Album)

Latest comment: 13 years ago by Theriusthechronicler in topic Professional Reviews

Orphaned references in Wilco's 7th studio album

edit

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of Wilco's 7th studio album's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "Cohen":

  • From Wilco: Cohen, Jonathan (April 13, 2007). "Wilco: In the Comfort Zone". Billboard. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help) Last accessed July 15, 2007.
  • From Kicking Television: Live in Chicago: Cohen, Jonathan (November 23, 2005). "Wilco Gives Chicago a 'Kick' on Live CD". Billboard. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help) Last accessed August 27, 2007.
  • From Wilco discography: Cohen, Jonathan (April 13, 2007). "Wilco: In The Comfort Zone". Billboard. {{cite news}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) Last accessed July 8, 2007.
  • From A Ghost Is Born: Cohen, Jonathan (2007-04-13). "Wilco: In the Comfort Zone". Billboard. {{cite news}}: Italic or bold markup not allowed in: |publisher= (help) Last accessed July 27, 2007.

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT 15:08, 22 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Professional Reviews

edit

According to WP:Album guidelines, until other more notable sources post articles (e.g. AMG, Rolling Stone), any website with a volunteer or paid staff of writers can be added to the page. As long as they aren't personal one-man blogs, up to 10 sources may be added (and removed as AMG, RS, etc. begin publishing their reviews). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.225.67.179 (talk) 08:03, 25 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

  • Is there a reason why the harvard crimson is a part of the album ratings? shouldn't it be removed based on the fact that it is not professional or a music publication? ...and does the user score from metacritic matter at all? I think that even if there were a substantial disparity between the scores, user ratings do not constitute notable reviews. --the authentic david christians (talk) 01:57, 1 January 2011 (UTC)Reply