Talk:WikiProject Medicine
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Czar in topic Merger discussion
 | Material from WikiProject was split to WikiProject Medicine on March 29, 2023 from this version. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted so long as the latter page exists. Please leave this template in place to link the article histories and preserve this attribution. The former page's talk page can be accessed at Talk:WikiProject. |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that an image or photograph of WikiProject Medicine be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Infobox and logo?
editWhich infobox and logo are most appropriate? ---Another Believer (Talk) 16:59, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- added (change if it needs something more)--Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 18:31, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks! ---Another Believer (Talk) 18:32, 29 March 2023 (UTC)
- [1] if article is connected to wikidata,how do we populate it ([https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Authority_control authority control)?
Suggest AFD
editAt least three editors now in this discussion have opined that this article barely meets notability and should not exist (almost every source is not independent or is quoting someone who is not independent). It is unfortunate this navel-gazing was created; if someone takes it to AFD, I'll be a Delete per the obvious COI of the persons writing about themselves and being interviewed. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:23, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- I agree, and one editor being given special prominence was way out of order.[4] Graham Beards (talk) 14:30, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- That makes four. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:45, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
Merger discussion
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
I propose the rewritten content here be merged back from whence it came (Wikiproject), and this page be redirected to there.
- Support, merge the rewritten content here and redirect this article back to WikiProject, from where the original content was split. There are marginal (and mostly non-independent) sources on this topic (written and published by WPMED members), some of the sources are merely interviews with involved members, some of the sources present outright falsehoods, and this article is navel gazing. Even one of the published authors agrees. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 15:52, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Second choice, delete per Colin (would require a trip to AFD I believe). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 21:57, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- Support. I concur. Graham Beards (talk) 15:39, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- I'd rather go for delete. The Wikiproject article still briefly mentions WikiProject Medicine twice and that is sufficient imo. The originally forked content and the current revised text are both too much navel gazing. The Wikiproject article's job is to tell readers what a Wikiproject is, not for us to blow our own trumpets or self-cite our own "review" articles about how wonderful and important we are. -- Colin°Talk 16:16, 3 April 2023 (UTC)
- The main article only mentions WPMED once now, because the second one failed verification (and also wasn't true). I support either a merge or deletion. WhatamIdoing (talk) 01:50, 5 April 2023 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.