Talk:West Coast Wilderness Railway
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Phillip.davis.oz in topic history of engines
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the West Coast Wilderness Railway article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
earlier comments edit
- Ok guys, every new entry gets the treatment fair enough.
- Surely, West Coast Wilderness Railway, Tasmania - would
be more appropriate than doing the Australia bit. I cannot understand why the word tourist creeps in. The usual things it was called while it was being rebuilt was the Abt and things like that. User:SatuSuro 7 July 2005 11:42 (UTC)
Stopping Places edit
might look odd temporarily - have mislaid mileage/kilometre list to make sense of this section SatuSuro 10:08, 17 October 2006 (UTC)
history of engines edit
The article details the re-use of the old engines, but it says: "ABT 2 is currently on display in Hobart in a museum and ABT 2 was scrapped into parts for the other engines." Clearly, one of these references should be to "ABT 4" - but which one is it? Can somebody who knows correct this? Phillip.davis.oz (talk) 05:55, 5 May 2011 (UTC)