Talk:Weightmans

Learn more about this page

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

England Low‑importance

	England portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Law Low‑importance

	Law portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Law, an attempt at providing a comprehensive, standardised, pan-jurisdictional and up-to-date resource for the legal field and the subjects encompassed by it.LawWikipedia:WikiProject LawTemplate:WikiProject Lawlaw articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Untitled edit

Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The firm is prominent enough to be notable. But tha article needs improving.Rathfelder (talk) 19:35, 7 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Removal of Factual and Cited Content edit

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Someone with the Username @83udbfdg appears to be removing and deleting factual, accurately sourced information. This is possibly window dressing, but since it's factual and in the public interest, there doesn't seem to be any reason to keep deleting - especially without explanation,

If it persists, would suggest a block from further edits. 2A00:23C6:8401:2101:C414:4655:4B3D:7FE0 (talk) 07:57, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

@83udbfdg perhaps you could explain what is "untruthful"? There is a High Court Judgement which refers to Weightmans cited.... 2A00:23C6:8401:2101:C414:4655:4B3D:7FE0 (talk) 08:09, 12 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic