Talk:Wedding of Carl XVI Gustaf and Silvia Sommerlath
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Requested move 19 September 2020
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: Moved(non-admin closure) Megan☺️ Talk to the monster 09:26, 26 September 2020 (UTC)
Wedding of Carl XVI Gustaf of Sweden and Silvia Sommerlath → Wedding of Carl XVI Gustaf and Silvia Sommerlath – For consistency with the article title Carl XVI Gustaf. 73.110.217.186 (talk) 02:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support. I'm pretty sure that this one doesn't need a disambiguator. 3K008P9 (talk) 03:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
- Support per WP:CONCISE. The disambiguator is definitely unnecessary. Rreagan007 (talk) 05:49, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
Mainau
editNo guests from Lennart Bernadotte and his family?79.238.77.239 (talk) 09:20, 23 February 2022 (UTC)
Sigvard and Marianne
editSwedish Royal Court communications accredit Sigvard and Marianne Bernadotte their Luxembourgish comital titles, see here and here. After lengthy discussion at King Charles III's coronation guest list, consensus was reached that guest list should follow formal styling. Therefore, in light of the disagree about a similar matter on this article, I am in favour of once again deferring to formality and the titles used by the Court. Richiepip (talk) 21:22, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
- The matter of what their correct titles actually are has been discussed in several other places and the general agreement is that what's best is to use their names without titles, as their article names clearly show. The royal court of Sweden makes a lot of errors & has no definitive jurisdiction here. Since this continues to be reverted here time and time again anyway, without consensus, I suppose the intelligent thing to do would just be to give up. I am not in favor of edit warring. --SergeWoodzing (talk) 11:18, 14 September 2023 (UTC)