Talk:Waterway E40

Transport Low‑importance

	Transport portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Transport, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TransportWikipedia:WikiProject TransportTemplate:WikiProject TransportTransport articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Belarus Low‑importance

	Belarus portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Belarus, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Belarus on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BelarusWikipedia:WikiProject BelarusTemplate:WikiProject BelarusBelarus articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Poland Low‑importance

	Poland portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Poland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Poland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PolandWikipedia:WikiProject PolandTemplate:WikiProject PolandPoland articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Ukraine Low‑importance

	Ukraine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Does anyone else feel this article has been written in a way to give a solely negative slant to this project? Particularly the 15 points later down in the article which seem to veer into original research in some of the points, using the phrase "it doesn't make economic sense" over and over again? I feel this section could be consolidated at the very least as it reads as a 15 point manifesto against the project currently — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:1700:3901:1AD0:309A:9A5A:7A8:D25C (talk) 11:15, 14 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Yes, this article seems very one sided. 188.22.178.4 (talk) 21:29, 25 July 2022 (UTC)Reply

Add topic