This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of engineering on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EngineeringWikipedia:WikiProject EngineeringTemplate:WikiProject EngineeringEngineering articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Science, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ScienceWikipedia:WikiProject ScienceTemplate:WikiProject Sciencescience articles
Talk:Watershed delineation is part of WikiProject Geology, an attempt at creating a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use geology resource. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.GeologyWikipedia:WikiProject GeologyTemplate:WikiProject GeologyGeology articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago4 comments3 people in discussion
@Onel5969: Thanks for your input on the new page I created recently. You added the refimprove tag, which apparently means "more citations needed." Wondering if you could be more specific? There are already 21 citations, which seems like a lot for a short article. Is there something you feel is missing? Mheberger (talk) 13:20, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Actually, it's not a short article. But there are several sections which are wholly uncited. In addition, there is another section which uses raw links, which should also be fixed. Hope this helps. Onel5969TT me 17:59, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
Ah, I see. I didn't know Wikipedia:Bare_URLs were a problem, but now I see. Thanks, that helps a bit. Mheberger (talk) 20:58, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
I have added citation needed tags where I think citations should be added. 141Pr {contribs/Best page} 20:47, 15 February 2023 (UTC)Reply
