Talk:Washington State Route 117

Latest comment: 14 years ago by Admrboltz in topic GA Review
Good articleWashington State Route 117 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 12, 2009Good article nomineeListed

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Washington State Route 117/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    You abbreviate SR 117 twice, you don't need to again in the RD.
Fixed.
OK.  /  --Admrboltz (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    An image would be nice, but the map checks out.
  • An image can be added sometime later this year when I go on a road trip to Port Angeles.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Passing. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC)  Reply