Talk:War Zone C

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Mztourist in topic Recent Revert Discussion

Requested move 13 October 2022

edit
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover)Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 07:08, 28 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


War zone CWar Zone C – The official wartime form of the name, and the one used always everywhere in every source. 5.173.41.12 (talk) 22:00, 13 October 2022 (UTC) — Relisting. – robertsky (talk) 01:36, 21 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Recent Revert Discussion

edit

Regarding this

So, when I see notes and references, it doesn't seem consistent to me. Maybe I'm wrong. DarklitShadow (talk) 17:55, 20 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

DarklitShadow What are you saying? The page is referenced. What is unreferenced that you believe needs to be fixed and which justifies the tag? You seem to tag a vast number of pages, but make little effort to fix the "problems" you have identified. That is Wikipedia:Tag bombing. Mztourist (talk) 03:06, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
When I see something with notes and references I get confused about lack of standardization. Is it correct (or incorrect) to have two separate source sections?
DarklitShadow (talk) 19:42, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Its not how I would do it, but we are all bound by WP:CITEVAR. Just because you get confused doesn't mean it requires tagging, rather you should start a discussion on the relevant Talk Page. Mztourist (talk) 03:26, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply