Talk:WUVN

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Connecticut Low‑importance

	Connecticut portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Connecticut, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Connecticut on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConnecticutWikipedia:WikiProject ConnecticutTemplate:WikiProject ConnecticutConnecticut articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

I mistakenly reverted 205.188.116.66's edit on September 3, thinking they copied the entire article once again (which, admittedly they didn't). However, while their latest edit seems to have been re-written so that it isn't entirely a carbon copy of the website in question, the re-write is still rather poorly written and structured (as is 205.188.116.xx's usual style, no offense to them). If anyone wants to restore 205.188.116.66's edit (as a properly written and structured article), go ahead. (I probably won't get around to this task anytime soon.) - Hinto 20:41, 3 September 2005 (UTC)Reply

205.188.116.66 had decided to copy the content from [1] again, and again interspersed content from that page with his/her own poorly articulated additions. I've attempted to re-word the article so that it sounds less like a direct copy from the aforementioned site; if you don't think it's enough, either re-word it further or just delete the whole thing and start from scratch (though I have a feeling 205.188.116.xx will do his/her thing again should that happen). - Hinto 02:51, 8 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

WHTX-LP channel number

Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The article states WHTX-LP is channel 43, however the FCC information gives the channel for WHTX-LP at channel 10. Jimtrue 11:16, 23 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Analog-to-digital conversion

Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

There is nothing in this Wikipedia article that discusses the analog-to-digital conversion, or CSA with WUTH. Can anyone expand on these? Seven1672 (talk) 19:14, 19 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Merge proposal

Latest comment: 20 hours ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@Sammi Brie, Nathan Obral, MrSchimpf, Wcquidditch, and BlueboyLINY: I propose merging WUTH-CD into WUVN. Even though WUTH-CD is the host station in the channel-sharing arrangement, it's not notable on its own, but it's at least worth a brief mention at WUVN. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 03:58, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your ping didn't hit because it was after the fact. You are probably right here, though. The history seems to be WXTV translator, sold to Entravision after it bought WUVN, Telefutura at launch. The concern I'd have is that this article's scope already is a little unwieldy, and WUTH-CD's history would become a footnote. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:40, 24 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Well, I tried it, @Mvcg66b3r. It's a small footnote, and it works. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 01:48, 29 June 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic