Talk:Volodymyr Pravyk
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 03:18, 9 January 2020 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 01:22, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Change to the Title Image edit
I changed the title image for this page because I think that the image I changed it to offers some improvements over the old image. The postcard rendition of Pravik's likeness is better lit than the image of the bust, and seems to be closely based on official photographs of Pravik available on the internet. So, while it would be much better if this page were headed by an actual photograph, among artist's conceptions of Pravik available to us, I think that this one is most visually presentable and the most accurate to his actual appearance. It would be greatly desired, at least by this editor, that a photographic portrait of Pravik find it's way onto Commons sometime soon.
CuriousQuail (talk) 17:47, 23 August 2021 (UTC)
Move to a B-class Article in WikiProject Biography edit
As a member of WikiProject Biography, I have changed the class of this article from a "stub" to a "B" based on that project's criteria. Over the course of the past month, I have been adding more content and citations to this article, and believe it to be up to the B-class criteria for WikiProject Biography. This criteria being that the article be "suitably referenced", "reasonably cover the topic", possess a "defined structure", be "reasonably well written", contain "supporting material where appropriate", and present "its content in an appropriately understandable way".[1] I believe that the article, in it's improved form, meets all of these criteria, and I have thus reclassified it as a "B" class article. This matter is open to further discussion, and I am willing to further explain my reasoning on request.
CuriousQuail (talk) 00:49, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:52, 31 December 2022 (UTC)
