Talk:Vizontele

Latest comment: 11 years ago by Eliotbates in topic Original research

Comments

edit

Original research

edit

While the current article features some interesting and potentially insightful interpretations of the subplots and subliminal meanings of the movie, nothing is referenced. This is especially problematic in the "Societal Conflicts" section, whose only references are to thoroughly unrelated secondary literature, and which reads as a school term paper. It would be more useful to quote from newspaper critics -- the current article does not really cover the critical reception of the film. eliotbates (talk) 20:14, 19 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Fair use rationale for Image:Logo vizontele.jpg

edit
 

Image:Logo vizontele.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:18, 1 July 2007 (UTC)Reply