Talk:Viscount Cobham
Latest comment: 16 years ago by M2o6n0k2e7y3 in topic Viscount Palmerston
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Untitled edit
Umm... There seems to be something wrong - there are only 10 people listed, but the current incumbent is the 11th Viscount. Who have we missed off?
James F. (talk) 12:49, 17 Jan 2004 (UTC)
- Ah, I see that this has been fixed. However, is the 11th Viscount Cobham really John William Leonard Lyttleton, not John William Leonard Lyttelton?
- And what's up with Peerage of the United Kingdom - it says that the current Viscount has also been awarded a Life peerage of Baron Lyttleton; presumably this is distinct from Baron Lyttelton?
- James F. (talk) 10:33, 18 Feb 2004 (UTC)
The 3rd Viscount should be listed as 2nd (not 1st) Earl Temple. Donald Renouf, 8th May 2004, 4.52 pm (BST)
- Hmm. No idea why the page was protected. Have now both unprotected and corrected.
- James F. (talk) 16:31, 8 May 2004 (UTC)
Viscount Palmerston edit
A question has arisen on Gen-Medieval over the evidence saying that the Viscounts Palmerston are related to the Temples of Stowe. So I've added a {{fact}} tag there and if anyone has a cite please <ref> it. Thanks. Wjhonson 16:45, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
I've updated the external link from, http://www.dukesofbuckingham.org/, to http://www.dukesofbuckingham.org.uk/, as they have moved. Thanks. --M2o6n0k2e7y3 (talk) 20:56, 16 February 2008 (UTC)