Talk:Viral hemorrhagic septicemia
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment
editThis article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 18 August 2020 and 4 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lilsharplilac.
Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 12:27, 17 January 2022 (UTC)
Virus
editThe title of this article is Viral hemorrhagic septicemia, but the description in the lead (and pretty much the whole article) is about the "rod-shaped virus". Should this article then be renamed Viral hemorrhagic septicemia virus (VHSV) or should it be corrected to describe the disease, with reference to the virus?? Ciar 06:11, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't know that any very constructive distinction could be made between the two; the article does cover symptoms and prevention, which arguably pertain the syndrome rather than the virus. -- Visviva 06:50, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
- My opinion is that when there is not enough material for separate articles on the virus and the disease, the most commonly used name should be applied (viral hemorrhagic septicemia, in this case). Sometimes the virus name is more appropriate, such as in Feline calicivirus, as opposed to Feline calicivirus infection. Sometimes the virus causes a few different diseases, so it is simpler to just name the article with the virus name, such as in Bovine herpesvirus 1. It's better than having two separate short articles, such as Avian infectious bronchitis and Avian infectious bronchitis virus. --Joelmills 00:59, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks for the feedback guys! I think I will just correct the article to read
- "Viral hemorrhagic septicemia is a disease caused by..."
- and keep a section to decribe the virus within this article. Leaves the option to separate it out later if preferred! Ciar 01:32, 5 June 2007 (UTC)
- Hello, if I could find more information about the evolution of this virus, would it be okay for me to add this in to the article?Lilsharplilac (talk) 15:23, 10 September 2020 (UTC)
- I added two sentences on the viral replication cycle, i.e. how the virus enters the host cell.Lilsharplilac (talk) 01:06, 19 September 2020 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Viral hemorrhagic septicemia. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20081214010507/http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0%2C1607%2C7-153-10371_10402-168753--%2C00.html to http://www.michigan.gov/dnr/0%2C1607%2C7-153-10371_10402-168753--%2C00.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:08, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Need source verification
editI am not able to verify the information presented in section "Immune reactions against VHSV". It appears to require clarification and/or expansion beyond what can be seen in the publicly-available abstract of the cited article by Shanaka, Tharuka, Priyathilaka and Lee (2019). I will cross-post to WikiProject Veterinary Medicine for expert review. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.18.248.196 (talk) 23:33, 9 March 2022 (UTC)
- doi:10.1074/jbc.REV120.012784 agrees that it inhibits VHS but is not as specific as our text is. Invasive Spices (talk) 10 March 2022 (UTC)