Talk:Victorian Railways K class
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
K 154 - N class conversion project
editI'd like to request that if details are to be included on the project to convert K 154 into an N class, can we please have properly cited references for this. Preferably, something a bit more verifiable than a discussion/bunfight on Railpage, perhaps a link to a project webpage for this conversion, or a report in a publication such as Newsrail? It's hard to tell from the edits if we're reading a reported opinion, or just the opinion of the editor, which would not be in keeping with WP:NOR. - Zzrbiker (talk) 12:03, 14 September 2008 (UTC)
Edinburgh Gardens Melbourne
editWas the locomotive that used to be in the Edinburgh Gardens, Melbourne one of these? Adamm (talk) 06:30, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
To whoever it is who keeps deleting preservation information out of this article...
editYou may think you are "improving" the article by removing a lot of information that other editors have spent significant time editing and providing references for.
Can I suggest that rather than simply reverting back your edits yet again, you take the time to explain why you think your edits are warranted and allow others to comment.