Needs further updating for Common Carrier status

edit

I'm not an expert, so I'm not going to make the changes, but I think it's pretty clear that the significance and meaning of this case has changed since this article was written. In 2015, the year after this decision, the FCC cited this case and the continuing need for Net Neutrality as the reason to class ISPs as "common carriers". This gave the FCC extremely broad jurisdiction and was widely seen as a huge win for Net Neutrality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.231.58.8 (talk) 16:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Ambassador Program course assignment

edit

  This article is the subject of an educational assignment at University of California, Berkeley supported by WikiProject Cyberlaw and the Wikipedia Ambassador Program during the 2014 Spring term. Further details are available on the course page.

The above message was substituted from {{WAP assignment}} by PrimeBOT (talk) on 17:22, 2 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  The redirect Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014) has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 January 16 § Verizon Communications Inc. v. Federal Communications Commission(2014) until a consensus is reached. Steel1943 (talk) 21:43, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply