Talk:Vegaphobia

Archives (Index)

1

This page is archived by ClueBot III.

Image needed

If anyone could supply a depiction of vegaphobia, it'd be much appreciated, e.g. protest signs, online posts, symbolic imagery. Uploads (see WP:COPYRIGHT and Copyright for Wikimedia Commons) usually have to be your own work... any vegaphobes here? Or veg(etari)ans. I tried to find images on Flickr but found nothing with the right copyright (see Wikipedia:Upload/Flickr). You could also request use of an image from any of the article sources/refs. I haven't done so because I don't think my chances are high, not knowing any of the sources personally. ‎⠀Trimton⠀‎‎ 15:48, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Unreliable content

This content is unreliable [1] (primary sources, non-academic sources) and was removed from the article for good reason. outdoorlife.com is a hunting website, not an academic or scholarly secondary source. The IP who added it has since agreed it was unreliable - as I explained on their user-page [2]. The content has been restored by Dchmelik for no valid reason. Psychologist Guy (talk) 18:27, 11 August 2022 (UTC)

That article seemed and sounded as a real propaganda thing against veganism. I'm happy to see Wikipedia users are ethical enough and aware of this plain fact about what veganism mean. MehdiTaba89 (talk) 07:38, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

This article is a travesty lmao. it's insane seeing people who actively decide to live a particular lifestyle dare to compare their situation in any shape or form to something like race or sexuality. especially seeing how the vegans are usually the condescending pretentious ones. 217.165.137.1 (talk) 04:20, 30 September 2022 (UTC)

Their situation is similar to allies of persecuted human groups. Speciesism is rightfully included in the discrimination infobox, consider vegaphobia speciesism by proxy. 2A02:C7C:D5F6:A300:9515:E8DD:8A6F:9FF6 (talk) 17:46, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

less masculine???

I am confused 41.114.152.41 (talk) 09:01, 15 December 2022 (UTC)

"Vegaphobia has been framed as connected to masculinity [...] issues." sounds like "validating" the myth "that eating meat is manly"

Though the "argument" "eating meat is manly" I have heard in the past personally, I think there is no validity to this. I think this should not be recognised as valid but debunked instead. 31.20.106.40 (talk) 02:08, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Misplaced not criticism placed in criticism

"Vegaphobia has been framed as an intersectional problem connected to masculinity, race and gender identity issues." is included under criticism, but it is not criticism of "vegaphobia" at all, it is a hypothesis about "vegaphobia" which validates it. There is no critique about "vegaphobia" present in that sentence, thus it should be placed elsewhere. Wallby (talk) 10:51, 25 December 2023 (UTC)

Proposing to place it under "causes of vegaphobia". Doing that now. If anyone disagrees I expect that they'll revert my change. Wallby (talk) 10:53, 25 December 2023 (UTC)