Talk:Vårbyfjärden
 | A fact from Vårbyfjärden appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 23 February 2008, and was viewed approximately 299 times (disclaimer) (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editWouldn't "firth" or "fjord" be a better translation than "bay"?--Berig (talk) 15:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- You are probably right. However, all my references suggest "bay" as the preferred translation. Vårbyfjärden in nothing like either a Scottish firth (typically much larger) or a Norwegian fjord (typically closed in one end). Of course it is not a "bay" either. So, well, I don't know, I can't think of any English word that would be translated into fjärd. Don't hesitate to edit the article though.
- / Mats Halldin (talk) 16:14, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- Anyway, an English-speaking person would probably call Vårbyfjärden a strait (sund), but, to my knowledge, that is not what the Swedish name implies.
- / Mats Halldin (talk) 16:18, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I know what you mean. I checked my copy of Norstedts' Swedish-English dictionary and it translated fjärd as "bay" (and maybe you are using the same work of reference). My suggestion is based on the fact that fjärd is basically just a dialectal form of fjord: if Vårbyfjärden had been located in Värmland, it would probably have been called Vårbyfjorden.--Berig (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have changed bay to inlet which I believe conveys the general usage of fjärd/fjord and it is also compatible with "bay".--Berig (talk) 17:49, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- That's fine with me. Tanks.
- / Mats Halldin (talk) 18:10, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on Vårbyfjärden. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070919003838/http://www.natur.huddinge.se/sjoar/varby/varby.htm to http://www.natur.huddinge.se/sjoar/varby/varby.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070927203224/http://www.stockholmskallan.se/index.php?sokning=10&infoorder=14&alter=7&talter=37 to http://www.stockholmskallan.se/index.php?sokning=10&infoorder=14&alter=7&talter=37
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:18, 24 January 2018 (UTC)