Talk:Utah State Route 101

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Rschen7754 in topic USRD GA audit
Good articleUtah State Route 101 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
October 7, 2008Good article nomineeListed

Assessment

edit

Complete, needs history is limited, B-Class. ~~ This page was edited by ĈĠ 20:48, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Utah State Route 101/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose):   b (MoS):  
    Some minor MOS breaches with missing non-breaking spaces between numbers and units in measurements that were just fixed.
  2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references):   b (citations to reliable sources):   c (OR):  
  3. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects):   b (focused):  
  4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:  
  6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):  
    A photo would be nice, but not required. The same goes for a map.
  7. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:  
    The paragraph in the History section on the car accident isn't really needed, IMHO. You might want to remove since it isn't very notable. Imzadi1979 (talk) 22:46, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

USRD GA audit

edit

This article has failed the USRD GA audit and will be sent to WP:GAR if the issues are not resolved within one week. Please see WT:USRD for more details, and please ask me if you have any questions as to why this article failed. --Rschen7754 (T C) 07:14, 5 April 2009 (UTC)Reply