Talk:Unwarranted variation

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Jpmaytum in topic Title of article

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Unwarranted variation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 15:03, 22 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Title of article edit

Given that the article is explicitly about the concept of unwarranted variation in healthcare, I wondered if the title of the article should explicitly reflect that - ie be Unwarranted Variation (Healthcare).

I know the brackets are usually used for 'not to be confused with' concepts - but it would seem to make sense to be clear from the get go on this particularly as the words themselves aren't subject specific.

What do others think? Jpmaytum (talk) 09:27, 30 June 2021 (UTC)Reply