Talk:University Recording Company

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the University Recording Company article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

This page was proposed for deletion by Another Believer (talk · contribs) on 9 January 2020.

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Pop music Low‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Record Labels Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Record Labels, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of record labels on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Record LabelsWikipedia:WikiProject Record LabelsTemplate:WikiProject Record Labelsrecord labels articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability

Latest comment: 4 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

@DGG: @Another Believer: This is straight down my alley of expertise. I've been collecting and researching 78rpm records such as this for... decades. This is one of the most obscure labels I've run across. Or as the case may be, not run across, as I've never seen a physical example in all these years. There's precious little available about it. There's a little blurb here and here, and what is interesting is that this *may* be the first record company to attempt a sales-through-mail as their sole distribution. This indicates that they signed Red Nichols, but I'll bet the obscure Ginger Snaps and "Teen-Agers Orchestra" would draw more collector/researcher interest. That's really all I can find on it, including some rather obscure resources I have access to. There's probably some in-depth coverage at [1], but I don't have this book. It is a reliable source. Just some thoughts. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:03, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

78.26, Thanks. Yeah, I was going to send to AfD this morning, but then decided I didn't feel strongly about making sure this article was deleted. I was just going to let the community decide over time. If you think the label is non-notable, I'd encourage you to take to AfD. ---Another Believer _(Talk) 21:06, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Well, I would like to see what Sutton has to say about it before I made that kind of decision. I would like to see that label scan retained, anyway, it is so scarce. The licensing should be changed to PD-Pre1978. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 21:17, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Add topic