Talk:Universal Display Corporation

Latest comment: 3 months ago by JamieBrown2011 in topic External links modified

Seriously, whoever put this together needs to display the Conflict of Interest badge in the edits and talk - this is a straight-up advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.43.92.66 (talk) 16:48, 12 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Changes edit

Don't want this to sound like an advert, so let me know of any changes we can make to keep it Encyclopedic.JamieBrown2011 (talk) 13:47, 28 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

I agree. It sounds like an advert badly translated from Korean.Saycheesepleasedear (talk) 13:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply
For example, the following section is a carbon copy of the summary of the source, by the source:
"UBI Research published a new report on flexible OLED displays, forecasting a very fast growth: from 20 million units in 2012 to 150 million units in 2013. UBI sees $6.3 billion in flexible OLED revenues in 2017. This is far more optimistic than the recent report by Markets&Markets who see the entire flexible display market at $3.2 billion in 2017."
However, the actual report and thus the source is available to purchase only, with a price ranging from approximately 300 to 1000 US$. --lmaxmai (talk) 14:32, 17 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

External links modified edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Universal Display Corporation. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:44, 21 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. It improves the page. JamieBrown2011 (talk) 11:01, 16 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Overlap with OLED page edit

Most of the content on this page isn't about the company but is a generic discussion of OLED as a technology--which is already covered by the OLED page. This is way, way outside my area of expertise, but someone should hack this page down to a just the relevant content (and possibly update the OLED page with information that's here and should be there). XKL (talk) 16:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Yes, it seems the overlap between the corporation and the tech they license out to Samsung, LG, Apple is rather blurred JamieBrown2011 (talk) 08:21, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Apple using OLEDs edit

It seems notable that Apple is moving their screen tech progressively over to OLED technology from Universal Display. I will add a section to the article unless someone disagrees. JamieBrown2011 (talk) 08:13, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

Update required edit

'Some financial analysts have contended that Universal Display's patents are likely to be rescinded in November 2013 at the EPO Board of Appeal'

This section needs updating 31.125.189.112 (talk) 08:13, 8 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

This is clearly outdated. Can some of these old discussions be archived please JamieBrown2011 (talk) 05:59, 30 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2022 (UTC)Reply