Talk:Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest 2012
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest 2012 article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=small}
Vandalism edit
The following users:84.1.170.80, 87.93.63.232, 94.20.37.58 are doing the vandalism of the article. Please protect the article.Зарицкий Максим (talk) 04:32, 15 February 2012 (UTC)
Placings and ties edit
The rules (or at least the Google translation of them - I am no expert in Ukrainian) say that "If two or more songs will take the same number of points the audience and jury, the winner will be the song that got the most points from the jury."
Should ties in the rankings be broken on the basis of this rule?
101.98.141.47 (talk) 06:35, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Ukraine in the Eurovision Song Contest 2012. Please take a moment to review my edit. You may add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it, if I keep adding bad data, but formatting bugs should be reported instead. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether, but should be used as a last resort. I made the following changes:
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://esctoday.com/news/read/17600
- Attempted to fix sourcing for http://www.esctoday.com/news/read/17875
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 07:25, 31 March 2016 (UTC)