This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.DisambiguationWikipedia:WikiProject DisambiguationTemplate:WikiProject DisambiguationDisambiguation articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Latest comment: 16 years ago3 comments3 people in discussion
After creating an article for a federal courthouse that was listed on the National Register of Historic Places as U.S. Courthouse I then disovered that there are several others listed in the NRHP. They were then redlinked to this page as shown by the "what links here" function so I created a disam page. Another editor converted this to a redirect, and when I approached them they simply referenced WP:OWN (odd since they don't seem to want their redirect edited) without any sort of policy based rationale. Which is better? Aboutmovies (talk) 08:30, 20 November 2007 (UTC)Reply
A disambiguation page seems to be the better choice here. There is no obvious US Courthouse that the reader might be searching for, so setting up a redirect to a particular one is unnecessary.--Danaman5 (talk) 08:14, 23 November 2007 (UTC)Reply