Talk:Typhoon Mitag (2002)

Typhoon Mitag (2002) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Typhoon Mitag (2002) is part of the 2002 Pacific typhoon season series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
September 20, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed
January 4, 2013	Good topic candidate	Promoted

Current status: Good article

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Mitag (2002)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 19:34, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

"the first super tyhoon" - typo/misspelled word
- Oops! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
"resulting in an islandwide power outage and" - Not sure if there is a mistake here, but I think it would read better as "resulting in islandwide power outages and"
- Well, it was one power outage islandwide, it wasn't multiple outages. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
"Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA)[nb 3];[1] the" - Shouldn't both the note and reference appear after the semicolon?
- Yea, oops. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
In the MH, why do you alternate between 1-minute and 10-minute sustained wind speeds? Is it because JWA uses 10-minute and JTWC uses 1-minute?
- Yep, just mentioning speeds from both of them. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
"in the FSM, producing a a wind gust of 76 km/h (47 mph) - Double word
- Blargh. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
"and portions of the town was flooded 1.5 m (5 ft)" - Shouldn't it be "and portions of the town were flooded 1.5 m (5 ft)"?
- Yep. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Be sure to link the publishers and some of the authors of the references.
- K, should be good! --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:01, 20 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Add topic