Talk:Typhoon Ike

Latest comment: 3 years ago by SMB99thx in topic A-class review
Good articleTyphoon Ike has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
July 24, 2018Good article nomineeListed
December 7, 2020WikiProject A-class reviewApproved
Current status: Good article

Todo

edit

More intro and impact. Jdorje 19:40, 11 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Todo (2017)

edit

GA Review

edit
This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Ike/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Courcelles (talk · contribs) 00:48, 24 July 2018 (UTC)Reply


A-class review

edit
Archived discussion. Current status: {{A-Class}}

This is just the lead. I didn't go through the whole article, because given the lead, the article needs a good amount of more work to do. I did notice one other thing:

  • Elsewhere, the outer extremities of Ike produced light rainfall and light breezes on Okinawa, peaking at 3.8 mm (0.15 in),[58] including 3.3 mm (0.13 in) in 24 hours and 2.2 mm (0.087 in) in an hour in Ibaruma. - while I appreciate your thoroughness, I don't think it's worth noting 3.3 mm of rainfall in 24 hours. Maybe, IDK, but these are incredibly small rainfall totals. Maybe say something like, "most of the precipitation feel in a one hour period"? But even then, I don't know if it's technically accurate.

Hurricanehink (talk) 17:45, 12 April 2019 (UTC)Reply

I addressed everything here @Hurricanehink:. YE Pacific Hurricane 18:29, 25 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
More
  • The meteorological history of Typhoon Ike can be traced back to an area of disturbed weather first identified as part of the region's monsoon trough southeast of Guam on August 21. - Maybe "origins" instead of met history, since it's clear that's what the section is about by its title.
  • this prompted the Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA) to start monitoring the system at 06:00 UTC on August 26 - monitor, or did the JMA classify it as a tropical depression? (hint, it's the latter, notice the "2" marker in the BT)
  • allowing both the JMA and the JTWC to upgrade the system to tropical storm intensity on August 27 - here would be a good point to add the name
  • Initially, the lingering presence of wind shear slowed intensification,[1] but data from the JTWC suggested that Ike briefly attained typhoon status on August 29 as wind shear temporarily decreased. - kinda sloppy/complicated. You already mentioned the debilitating wind shear in the previous paragraph.
  • The combination of increased wind shear induced by a trough passing to the storm's north and the typhoon's proximity to land caused Ike to weaken prior to its September 5 landfall on Hainan as a minimal typhoon. - could this sentence be split into two? You're trying to cover a lot.
  • After traversing the island, the storm continued to weaken and both the JTWC and JMA estimated that it moved into the Chinese mainland as a tropical storm 110 km (68 mi) southeast of Nanning, - note the comma. Also, the timing is odd. You say "after" and "continued" in the same thought. What would work better is - "Ike continued weakening while traversing the island, entering the Chinese mainland..."
  • Prior to its first landfall, a typhoon warning was issued by the Manila Weather Bureau - get rid of the passive voice. You never clarify what the "its" here, which could imply a Manila Weather Bureau landfall.
  • Further north, in Hong Kong, a No 1. hurricane signal was issued on September 4 and later that day was upped to a No 3. hurricane signal, but this signal was dropped once the storm dissipated inland. - is this redundant with you mentioning the typhoon warnings between HK and Beihai?
  • Typhoon Ike also struck the country a mere four days after Tropical Storm June inundated the northern portion of the country, which claimed 53 lives[21] and the islands were also suffering from the worst economic crisis since independence in 1946. - that's a lot for one sentence. The economic crisis bit should be a separate sentence.
  • Could you update Ike's death toll in the template for deadliest Philippine typhoons?

More later. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 14:47, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the review. YE Pacific Hurricane 16:19, 28 May 2019 (UTC)Reply
I have upgraded Typhoon Ike to A-class, since there is no more activity from Hurricanehink regarding this review and most of the fixes are done. Closing. AAlertBot: I hope you're doing things right. SMB99thx my edits! 05:42, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply