January 2021: Rolling back cited bio info in biobox edit

Wikipedia says that a celebrity's own website is an adequate RS for basic, noncontroversial facts, like marriage info. Would MichaelMaggs please weigh in as to how it's a BLP vio?--Quisqualis (talk) 19:41, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Quisqualis, The subject's ex-wife is not a celebrity, and it's a BLP violation to add her maiden name incorrectly sourced to her own website which does not, so far as I can see, disclose that information. MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:52, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
You're right, as I mistakenly read that it was Hunt's own website. A reliable source must still be found to ensure inclusion of the reverted material.--Quisqualis (talk) 20:07, 13 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion edit

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 07:37, 21 December 2022 (UTC)Reply