Talk:Tropical Storm Mekkhala (2015)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by 12george1 in topic GA Review
 | Tropical Storm Mekkhala (2015) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 11, 2015. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tropical Storm Mekkhala (2015) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
.png)
GA Review edit
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Tropical Storm Mekkhala (2015)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: 12george1 (talk · contribs) 01:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
I might as well review this one, too. Actually, the only issue I have is the short lead. For example, you have an MH with three decent-sized paragraphs, but have only four sentences about it (two of which are short sentences). More could also be said about the storm's impact, such as info about damage to agriculture and houses. Overall, this is a very decent article though and I will likely have no problem listing it as a Good Article after this issue is dealt with.--12george1 (talk) 02:07, 11 December 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks. I expanded the lead a bit. Better? ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:40, 11 December 2015 (UTC)