Talk:Triumph TR4

Automobiles Mid‑importance

	Cars portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Automobiles, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AutomobilesWikipedia:WikiProject AutomobilesTemplate:WikiProject AutomobilesAutomobile articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Brands

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Thought I might start a talk page to swap ideas and chat with other TR owners fom the present and days gone by. I owned TR2s, 3s and 4s and raced all of them...great fun and very fond memories of leaving MGBs in the dust! LOL.--Phil Wardle 04:42, 30 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

I believe the TR4A was not available until at least 1966 in the U.S. I owned a 1965 Triumph TR4, not a TR4A. The wire wheels on the 1965 TR4 were 60 spoke, not the previous 48 spoke wheels. I believe these wheels were wider than the 48 spoke wheels. 63.254.141.110 (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC) --63.254.141.110 (talk) 22:20, 24 March 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have a tr4a ex usa build in 1965 but tagged in California as a 1966 car. The width of the 60 spoke wire wheels were the same as the 48 spokes 4.5 J . 14 august 2011 — Preceding unsigned comment added by CTC57212 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 14 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

At "Engineering", the statement: "The pushrod Standard inline-four engine, was designed for use by Standard-Triumph in Triumph cars, but was also provided to Ferguson for use as tractor engines. The notion that Triumph used a tractor engine, rather than the other way around, is false.", appears to be at odds with information here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_wet_liner_inline-four_engine . I have added a "citation needed" flag after the statement. Citroënist (talk) 14:51, 23 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Add topic