This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics of the United Kingdom, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Politics of the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Politics of the United KingdomWikipedia:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomTemplate:WikiProject Politics of the United KingdomPolitics of the United Kingdom articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Umm, doesn't this belong on Wikisource (or whatever it's called)? older ≠ wiser 13:32, June 26, 2004
It probably belongs in both places. I uploaded the text of the treaty to Wikisource, but analysis should stay on Wikipedia. Ouraiтс 17:07, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Of course. My long ago comment was in regards to the article as it was then like [1]. older ≠ wiser 17:21, 4 January 2007 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
It looks out of place and awkwardly pushes the ordered list beside it. Anyone see a better place for it? Freddy Jade (talk) 03:44, 1 December 2008 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
