 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of Trade-Air destinations was copied or moved into Trade Air with this edit on 10:58, 8 November 2015. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
 | Trade-Air destinations was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 4 November 2015 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Trade Air. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Trade Air article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Support - I think that everything contained in Powdair can be safely contained under a subhead in Trade Air. Nicnote • ask me a question • contributions 13:20, 12 June 2017 (UTC)
Against - Powdair has no link to Trade Air as they are from 2 different countries the only reason they could be linked is that Trade Air was to operate flights for Powdair but are no longer going to CBG17 (talk) 22:48, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
Own Wikipedia Article edit
Powdair is a virtual airline and should therefore have its own article. Most others do, e.g. Citywing. - Jgh230 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jgh230 (talk • contribs) 19:00, 18 June 2017 (UTC)