Talk:Toro Negro State Forest

Learn more about this page

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Toro Negro State Forest article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Puerto Rico Mid‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Protected areas C‑class Low‑importance

	This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.Protected areasWikipedia:WikiProject Protected areasTemplate:WikiProject Protected areasProtected areas articles
C	This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Forestry Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Forestry, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the profession and science of forestry on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ForestryWikipedia:WikiProject ForestryTemplate:WikiProject ForestryForestry articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Suggestion edit

Latest comment: 10 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi, Unless there are plans to create new articles in the near future, I would suggest removing the links for redlinked items in the 'Flora and Fauna' box. Thanks, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 13:55, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

I am creating them. I was busy creating these ones: Sloanea berteroana, Magnolia portoricensis, Ocotea moschata, and Buchenavia capitata. In some cases, like HERE, I have had to expand the articles conisderably. Since plants and fauna are not my forte, it is taking a little longer than I expected. Thank you for your suggestion, Mercy11 (talk) 14:21, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Great! Ambitious! Thank you for your contributions. Kind regards, DA Sonnenfeld (talk) 14:57, 22 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Corrected photos of freshwater shrimp edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Effie Greathouse (talk) 07:52, 8 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

The photo which used to be identified as Atya lanipes is in fact a small Macrobrachium freshwater shrimp - a photo I took during my Ph.D. research, and which ended up in Wikimedia Commons without my knowledge, and incorrectly identified. I have added another photo I took that is of Atya lanipes. The Macrobrachium picture's filename still says Atya lanipes in the filename, but I have put in a request to get that fixed, and in the meantime, I corrected the label in the article.

Removal of Fauna & Flora infobox edit

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I have restored the fauna & flora infobox which was removed HERE with the comment "we don't need two infoboxes". I fail to see why the editor feels the infobox isn't needed. I invite the editor to discuss his views here. Mercy11 (talk) 18:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic