This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Figure Skating, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of figure skating-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Figure SkatingWikipedia:WikiProject Figure SkatingTemplate:WikiProject Figure SkatingFigure skating articles
Wikipedia is not a place for self-advertisement...edit
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I believe that the edit to the "Coaching Style" section on 9/10/11 is a more accurate and more properly-sourced version than the one the was there previously, and should remain a part of the article. What was there previously both lacked proper sourcing and fell more into the realm of advertisement for the article's subject's "coaching style."
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have removed this section. I read the section and the sources, and the material most critical of Zakrajsek is simply not supported by the sources. Material that leads to those assertions (an injury) is supported, but that isn't what matters. The section is criticizing the subject, which, if not well-supported, constitutes a BLP violation. The material should not be reinserted without discussion here.--Bbb23 (talk) 21:20, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
