Talk:Tom Wappel

Untitled

I would put the neutrality of this article under discussion [unsigned]

What specifically do you have a problem with? I went out of my way to avoid bias when I wrote this article. CJCurrie 17:54, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Liberals for Life rule

I wonder whether the sentences these sentences really belong here: "The Liberal constitution was amended following Chrétien's victory, permitting the leader to appoint candidates in certain ridings. Chrétien defended the change as necessary to prevent "single-issue groups" from taking over the Liberal Party. It was generally understood that Liberals for Life was the primary target of this remark.[14]" It strikes me that this more properly belongs in the Liberals for Life article, and that it is tangential to Wappel himself. (I will not be offended if someone reverts me on this: perhaps a rewrite to make the connection more explicit is in order?) Bucketsofg 05:00, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

• It's relevant to Wappel in the sense that LFL took control of several constituency organizations during the 1990 leadership campaign, and in the two-year period that followed. I see your point, however -- Wappel did not have a formal leadership role in the organization, and it may be peripheral to his page. CJCurrie 22:32, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

OK. Bucketsofg 01:53, 24 February 2006 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Tom Wappel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060105100345/http://www.christianity.ca/news/social-issues/2003/10.003.html to http://www.christianity.ca/news/social-issues/2003/10.003.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20050324021401/http://tomwappelmp.ca/ to http://www.tomwappelmp.ca/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060504103829/http://www.wcr.ab.ca/news/2006/0501/liberals050106.shtml to http://www.wcr.ab.ca/news/2006/0501/liberals050106.shtml
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.insidetoronto.ca/to/scarborough/story/3699360p-4276392c.html?loc=scarborough
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070929104828/http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=1213c00b-ec13-4948-98bb-880df8193292&k=89939 to http://www.canada.com/topics/news/national/story.html?id=1213c00b-ec13-4948-98bb-880df8193292&k=89939
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090711173219/http://www.theinterim.com/2009/feb/02wappel.html to http://www.theinterim.com/2009/feb/02wappel.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:57, 14 December 2017 (UTC)