Talk:Tolkien and the Norse

Tolkien and the Norse has been listed as one of the Language and literature good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: May 5, 2023. (Reviewed version).

Middle-earth Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle-earth, which aims to build an encyclopedic guide to J. R. R. Tolkien, his legendarium, and related topics. Please visit the project talk page for suggestions and ideas on how you can improve this and other articles.Middle-earthWikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earthTemplate:WikiProject Middle-earthTolkien articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Note: Though it states in the Guide to writing better articles that generally fictional articles should be written in present tense, all Tolkien legendarium-related articles that cover in-universe material before the current action must be written in past tense. Please see Wikipedia:WikiProject Middle-earth/Standards for more information about this and other article standards.

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[Hobbit#Plot|Battle of the Five Armies]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

GA Review edit

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Tolkien and the Norse/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GimliDotNet (talk · contribs) 20:05, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

I'll start to review this article. I've not added any content to it and am quite familiar with the general concepts discussed.

Many thanks, looking forward to it! Chiswick Chap (talk) 20:28, 4 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Another good bit of work. Happy to mark as GA. GimliDotNet (talk) 18:16, 5 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):

b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a. (reference section):

b. (citations to reliable sources):

c. (OR):

d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
It is broad in its coverage.
a. (major aspects):

b. (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):

b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/fail:

(Criteria marked are unassessed)

Add topic