 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Reviews
editThis movie was awesome....not awful watch it again and pay attention....it's clever and the actors are good. I couldn't wait to own it and watched it many times — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.59.235.189 (talk) 21:30, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
It's awful, I agree. I don't understand why the critique is the first part of the article. Would anyone object to that being moved down and some positive critiques being added?69.1.116.33 22:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)Dontinsertnamehere 23:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Also, I'm looking over all the reveiws I can find. "Many critics" doesn't seem to be accurate in the slightest.Dontinsertnamehere 23:08, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
I moved the Ebert piece down under Critic's Response. I've seen some postive commentary, I'm just not sure how to work it in.Dontinsertnamehere 23:16, 16 October 2007 (UTC)
Just go with a "However, other reviews were more positive. For instance..." below Eberts? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.71.82.82 (talk) 19:15, 24 October 2008 (UTC)