Talk:Thornden School

Assessment

I have assessed this article as Stub / Low. The article contains some encyclopedic content, but needs expanding and reviewing to remove noticeable WP:NPOV issues with references. An infobox and some pictures would also improve the article. Camaron1 | Chris 19:58, 9 May 2007 (UTC)

Fire In 2002: News Section: Keep?

Keep the Fire In 2002 News Section? The links there are either dead or repeated as references. Jwikiediting (talk) 20:25, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes keep this section. More references however need to be found. Jwikiediting (talk) 10:36, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

I have improved this section by fixing dead links and finding more. Jwikiediting (talk) 10:50, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Website Ravamp

The Thornden School website has been revamped. I have done my best to update all links and content, however it will still need help from others. Jwikiediting (talk) 10:35, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Thornden School. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20120525115000/http://www.edubase.gov.uk/EstablishmentView.aspx?EstablishmentID=16424 to http://www.edubase.gov.uk/EstablishmentView.aspx?EstablishmentID=16424

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 09:09, 1 March 2016 (UTC)

Controversy section

The people need to know. Satomoshi (talk) 18:59, 11 March 2023 (UTC)

While I agree that the incident is an important part of the school's history and should be mentioned, until there is a reliable source detailing it, it shouldn't be added to the article. Invisi-splat (talk) 19:23, 11 March 2023 (UTC)