Talk:Thomas Neely
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Thomas Neely article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg)
 | This article was created or added to during the Victoria Cross Reference Migration. It may contain material that was used with permission from victoriacross.net. |  |
Theft of Neely's Victoria Cross a hoax? edit
According to several local news articles (don't know which is the original, but this one is an example, as is this) there was no theft, and the claimant was not the 'rightful owner', who still possessed Neely's Victoria Cross. According to other sources the VC was later sold at auction at Spink of London on November 25th 2010 (about six months after the alleged theft). This version of events is indirectly confirmed by the official Spink catalogue, which lists the medal on auction at November 25th 2010.
External links modified edit
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Thomas Neely. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130511090754/http://www.kingsownmuseum.plus.com/neelyvc.htm to http://www.kingsownmuseum.plus.com/neelyvc.htm
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:24, 25 December 2017 (UTC)