Talk:Thomas McGuane

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Randykitty in topic Merge bib

WikiProject class rating edit

This article was automatically assessed because at least one WikiProject had rated the article as start, and the rating on other projects was brought up to start class. BetacommandBot 16:26, 28 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem edit

 

This article has been reverted by a bot to this version as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) This has been done to remove User:Accotink2's contributions as they have a history of extensive copyright violation and so it is assumed that all of their major contributions are copyright violations. Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. VWBot (talk) 13:19, 10 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Merge bib edit

Looks like the separate bibliography article is mostly duplicated here. No need for two articles, this author hasn’t got so many works as to justify a separate list article, even if he meets the minimum standards. I proposed a merge. Montanabw(talk) 05:06, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

  • Support - merge. Atsme Talk 📧 05:13, 11 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
  • Redirected, as this was mostly already included here. Bibliography is not so large that it needs a separate article. --Randykitty (talk) 11:07, 25 December 2019 (UTC)Reply