 | The Xindi has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: June 24, 2016. (Reviewed version). |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the The Xindi article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | A fact from The Xindi appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 July 2016 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=link}
Fair use rationale for Image:The Xindi (ENT episode).jpg
edit.jpg){kind=link}
Image:The Xindi (ENT episode).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The 'Show Changes' section
editI think most of this article could go. Everything about Star Trek has been criticized at one point or another, I don't think it should be noted.
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on The Xindi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160304062219/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/17900/star-trek-enterprise-the-complete-3rd-season/ to http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/17900/star-trek-enterprise-the-complete-3rd-season/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160303235110/http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/62392/star-trek-enterprise-complete-third-season/ to http://www.dvdtalk.com/reviews/62392/star-trek-enterprise-complete-third-season/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Issues With Character Development Section
editThe Character Development section of the article comes across as a very POV list of complaints about sexualization of characters in the series. Currently I would vote that the entire section be either removed or re-written from scratch. 184.186.197.37 (talk) 16:53, 2 September 2020 (UTC)
IGN review
editJust a quick note on the review from IGN. From the archive copy of the review you can that it was originally rated 1 out of 5 stars.[1] IGN later switched to giving review scores out of 10, and doubled up the score, so if you look at the updated version of the review it gets 2 out 10.[2] It is a small difference but I think the scale matters. Normally I would update a reference to use live URL that is currently available but I this case I have deliberately left the archive copy as it is. Something to be aware of if you see any other IGN reviews for this series that are rated on a scale out of 10. -- 109.76.150.214 (talk) 23:06, 3 May 2021 (UTC)