Talk:The Supernaturalist

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Cavarrone in topic "Pazza" listed at Redirects for discussion

I am very happy with this article. It tells just about everything you need —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.233.186.240 (talk) 13:48, 4 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Plot summary

edit

It's non existenet someone make it existent!

Merge Booshka

edit

I'm gonna go ahead and merge it. Pedgeth 21:56, 19 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Protection

edit

Should this page be protected? how do we protect it? Pedgeth 22:08, 1 December 2006 (UTC)Reply


Next Book?

edit

Any new information on a sequal? Its 2008 now..

I added in referenced information on the sequel, but it's not much, just Colfer saying he's workin' on a sequel. IceUnshattered (talk) 18:56, 2 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Why is the sequel's release listed as 2019? Surely that can't be true. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.2.82.101 (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

Somebody posted that the interview took place on February 31, 2009. Clearly, February 31st is not an actual day since there are only 28 days in February. This error should be remedied to make the article accurate.

Edits

edit

I think there are some pointless things in this article that could be removed. For instance:

"Blue Laguna / Parasite Eve OST : A section of Blue Laguna . net that posts free mp3 downloads of the Parasite Eve RPG. Strangely, most of these songs sound Supernaturalist-themed."

This link has nothing to do with the book itself, other than someone's opinion of the music fitting the theme and plot. I don't think it should be here.

Also, if there hasn't been anything said about a movie being made why mention it at all? Obviously fans would like to see a movie (I sure would), but we know that. If it hasn't been anounced, then you might as well take out 'Movie' from 'Movie and Sequel?'

Merger proposal

edit

I AGREE!

Characters Section

edit

hey, I just edited a bunch of the stuff on the page because I came to it and it was a disaster. It still isn't great, but I took the 'people' out of 'people places and things' and created the 'characters' section. i fixed some typos, restructured some sentences, et cetera. Rustypuddle (talk) 01:06, 8 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Places/Things

edit

This does not need to exist. If anything, it should be included in the summary of the plot. This reads more like a wiki or personal project than a wikipedia article. Even if there was a need for it to exist, it's very personified and bloated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MelonKony (talkcontribs) 10:54, 31 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

"Pazza" listed at Redirects for discussion

edit

  The redirect Pazza has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Readers of this page are welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 October 17 § Pazza until a consensus is reached. Cavarrone 14:29, 17 October 2023 (UTC)Reply