Talk:The Restoration (1910 film)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Restoration (1910 film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Don't worry, we'll get through these JAGUAR  19:18, 30 May 2015 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   I would recommend splitting the lead into two paragraphs to make the lead more balanced, per WP:LEAD

   "Little is known of the production credits, but the film does feature Marie Eline as the little girl" - could be re-worded so Marie Eline is mentioned first

   Nothing on production in the lead?

   "The writer of the scenario is unknown, but it was most likely Lloyd Lonergan" - this needs a citation

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

The reception section is very well detailed, so this one should come to a pass like the rest. Well done JAGUAR  20:55, 2 June 2015 (UTC)